tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5622522409342872165.post933814041818247817..comments2023-10-31T11:51:19.117-04:00Comments on exulting grace!: Diminished Distinctions, Diminished Glory?danny2http://www.blogger.com/profile/13010556674654842010noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5622522409342872165.post-21460929128169987192008-05-12T13:07:00.000-04:002008-05-12T13:07:00.000-04:00"The whole Scripture is Gospel-centered." - Yes ..."The whole Scripture is Gospel-centered." - Yes and Amen!!<BR/><BR/>"All the promises of God (Old and New Testament) find their 'yes' in Christ." - Yes and Amen!!<BR/><BR/>"All the promises of God in the Old Testament are fulfilled in the Gospel of Jesus Christ" should be revised to "have been, are, or will be fulfilled in the Gospel of Jesus Christ."Keith's Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08964796812967643279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5622522409342872165.post-67419070672834272292008-05-11T17:43:00.000-04:002008-05-11T17:43:00.000-04:00"For example, certainly the Church (consisting of ..."For example, certainly the Church (consisting of Jew and Gentile) today has not received the fulfillment of the covenant promise of the land between the Euphrates and the Nile rivers (Genesis 15:18)."<BR/><BR/>All the promises of God in the Old Testament are fulfilled in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The whole Scripture is Gospel-centered - not chronologically, in that other events came before it - but in logical priority. All the promises of God (Old and New Testament) find their 'yes' in Christ. I would recommend a great blog entitled "The Vossed World" by our friend Chad Bresson from Clearcreek Chapel for a load of thinking on this issue.DLhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00775191828560028746noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5622522409342872165.post-81261419663246930202008-05-11T17:37:00.000-04:002008-05-11T17:37:00.000-04:00For example, certainly the Church (consisting of J...For example, certainly the Church (consisting of Jew and Gentile) today has not received the fulfillment of the covenant promise of the land between the Euphrates and the Nile rivers (Genesis 15:18). That is a promise that is yet to be fulfilled, must come to the physical descendants of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph who are also spiritually regenerated, and of which the Church will be a participant/beneficiary by virtue of its grafting in to Israel's patriarchal covenant promises.Keith's Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08964796812967643279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5622522409342872165.post-46228111125858538782008-05-09T14:05:00.000-04:002008-05-09T14:05:00.000-04:00I have, no doubt, worked very hard to diminish one...I have, no doubt, worked very hard to diminish one particular distinction between Jew and Gentile, namely that which makes the one an heir of all God's covenant promises in Christ and the other an heir of only some. It's a labor I hope to continue.<BR/><BR/>Will no one tell me how to include links in comments!? I feel so inept.Bradhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14201097162541151841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5622522409342872165.post-19916185940539840612008-05-09T09:54:00.000-04:002008-05-09T09:54:00.000-04:00good distinction keith.thank yougood distinction keith.<BR/><BR/>thank youdanny2https://www.blogger.com/profile/13010556674654842010noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5622522409342872165.post-47736295597487543272008-05-09T09:35:00.000-04:002008-05-09T09:35:00.000-04:00Hi guys . . .Seems like we've had this discussion ...Hi guys . . .<BR/><BR/>Seems like we've had this discussion before! So, I repeat myself when I suggest that the necessary distinction is not between Jew and Gentile, but between Israel and the Church (consisting of both Jew and Gentile in one body) as presently distinct but eventually unified (in the future, but with some overlap now) programs of God. The danger of replacement theology is that it attempts to replace the promises of God to Israel that are yet to be fulfilled with a reduced, mysticized version of the promises fulfilled in the experience of the Church.Keith's Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08964796812967643279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5622522409342872165.post-30039699181981564292008-05-09T09:10:00.000-04:002008-05-09T09:10:00.000-04:00of course you don't believe in the absolute sense....of course you don't believe in the absolute sense. (even a homosexual--claiming this verse as their justification--will acknowledge they still see a difference between men/women, for they prefer their same sex.)<BR/><BR/>however, you do <A HREF="http://theequipper.blogspot.com/2007/11/keeping-distinctions-israel-and-church.html" REL="nofollow">work pretty hard</A> to diminish the distinctions. <BR/><BR/>even the good willed person who claims "i don't even think of you as a black man" (in their attempt toward racial harmony) betrays their very case. by making that statement, they acknowledge that they actually do notice color. <BR/><BR/>absolute abolishment of distinction is actually impossible. but ignoring it, or diminishing the distinction happens all the time.danny2https://www.blogger.com/profile/13010556674654842010noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5622522409342872165.post-47969158592951380942008-05-09T06:46:00.000-04:002008-05-09T06:46:00.000-04:00The only person I've ever heard say that there is ...The only person I've ever heard say that there is no distinction between Jew and Gentile is Paul, but I've never heard of a replacement theologian who understands this to mean that the Jew/Gentile distinction has been destroyed in any absolute sense. If I ever meet one who says that, however, I'll let him know you have a good argument for him :)Bradhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14201097162541151841noreply@blogger.com